Find a Lawyer

ANWAR-BAIG versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/338 D / 34 was accused of praising the evidence that he was the son of the deceased's father-in-law and that the hotel in front of the incident was with the relatives of the two parties when the incident took place. Both parties were present at the time, the witnesses of the inappropriate complainant and the prosecution had fully explained their presence at the relevant time and nothing was available on the record to suspect their presence. The motive was not only acknowledged by the accused. , But it was also strengthened by the accusation that the victim had also shown humility. The accused's daughter was not on record that the accused pleaded to work to exercise her right to self-defense. The accused for the first time testified before the prosecution's witnesses that he had suffered injuries. Although the victim's hands were unfounded prior to the shooting and the prosecution's witnesses are related to the prosecution, they did not prove that witnesses' testimony could be safely relied upon when reached by a trial court. It could be relied upon, that the accused was affirmed under Section 338D of the death sentence by trial. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Khanqah Sharif lawyer