Find a Lawyer

FAIZ AHMED versus KHAN MUHAMMAD

In the case of the Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 declaration, the original owner of the property, who was in the interests of the parties, survived his widow, and a daughter, defendant, was confirmed that he had been given his daughter The plaintiff has been entitled to the legacy of the proposal. They filed a lawsuit for the declaration that they are the landlord because they are the real homeowners who practice customs and do not inherit Islamic law. And that in the favor of the defendants the inheritance was an illegal trial court which relied on the copy of the obligee. Arz concluded that the rule of inheritance in the village concerned was based on the customs of the pagandah and that the appellate court agreed with the trial court's finding that both the courts had misused the obligatory ALZ documents because the petition Was the condition of a customs request to be given. When such a process was adopted only without the death of the proposals where the custom of the \ pagand of will prevail on the record, the writing was not sufficient to prove that the death of the original owner / proposition was not sufficient. While it has been fully proved that the original owner survived through his widow, and evidence on record shows that the deceased widow died nearly 20 years after her death. And his daughter died three years after the death of his widow. The courts below also did not take into account the question which was otherwise banned from filing a suit for a period of six years under Article 1209F Limitation Act, 1908. With the irregularities of the courts below criminal advocate from Havelian lawyer