MUHAMMAD YOUNIS versus THE STATE
Sections 302/324/337 F (ii) / 427/148/149 Colonial Procedure Code (V 1898), the transfer of the case to Section 439 Juvenile Court, the accused demanded that the case be transferred to the Juvenile Court. Was. He is under the age of 18 at the time of the incident when the accused, along with a scientific record containing documents containing his age, was prepared after the registration of the case against him and information on the same date. Was based on The accused party was prepared to falsify any record, not to provide births and no independent evidence, so that any favorable finding in connection with the current criminal case, consisting of three senior doctors. The medical board unanimously determined the age of the suspect. Having been above 25 years of age but under 35, the High Court faced serious doubts about authenticity and genius after looking at the accused and engaging him in conversation in the courtroom. His record of his age, which he claimed was made by the Sessions Court, dismissing the defendant's request to move the case to the Juvenile Court for any jurisdiction of weakness, illegality, malpractice or misconduct. The victim was not there to guarantee high-level interference. The court, using its amended jurisdiction, dismissed the review request accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Upper Deval lawyer