Find a Lawyer

RAJA MUHAMMAD HANIF versus THE STATE

National Accountability Bureau Ordinance 1999 Section 9 (iv) (v) Definition of Evidence alleges that the beneficiary was not given an opportunity to be heard in the case The wife and brother's brother-in-law were acquitted on remand. But the properties there have confiscated their names on the assumption that the accused was purchased through funds provided by Syed Banameed and was entitled to show cause notice on the proposed confiscation of their properties and a hearing before the Accountability Court. To which they also had a right. Examine the prosecution's witnesses and present their own evidence to establish their ownership, so that in the case of the head of some witnesses who have been acquitted of anonymous transactions, a case has already been registered in this case. For permissible cross-examination purposes and the prosecution was allowed to withdraw the aforementioned witnesses thereafter, after presenting their own oral and documentary evidence to prove their independent title, the subsequent conviction and conviction of the accused. Has been set aside and the case is ordered to begin the trial in light of the above observations. The response was sent to court. By law, pass a new judgment based on the material on record top advocate from Kamra lawyer