Find a Lawyer

BAHAWAL BAKHSH versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34 and 114/34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Definition of Section 9 Evidence There is no dispute between the ocular account and the medical evidence, the names of the accused, the weapons used by the accused, The role played by the accused and the names of the witnesses was mentioned in full detail in the FIR. There was light, immediately mentioned in the FIR, there was no evidence in evidence or to prove that the complainant was lying against them. There was a hostility to Tee's removal. The accused was absconding from the court and had to look for the particular quantity, not the quantity, which appeared in the present case from an unforgivable source and nothing was on record to show it. Witnesses told a lie that the incident occurred because of religious differences, the trial court fully covered, the special judge created under the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, formed under the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 Was particularly competent to give, the prosecution successfully proved the purpose of getting to know each other, there was no question due to wrong question, Section 114, PPC was also This was applied in the case when the incident was due to the alleged misconduct by the accused which led to the murder of the co-accused. He and co-accused was not a shot was fired, but the bullet was fired again, killing the deceased prosecution was successful. Medical family advocate from Doltala lawyer