Find a Lawyer

TAHIR KHAN versus THE STATE

Defining the evidence of being one of the victims of Section 302 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 attacks certainly looked at the attacker who attacked him and his two Companions, who died on the spot, died of injuries. Before his death, he had given a brief and concise statement that was read to him or confirmed by a peer doctor who was an independent witness and his confirmation was as authentic as any judicial magistrate. Depends. Safe, he emphasized the above statement, which he made in a derogatory manner, lacks any of the components of the dying declaration and which were either endorsed or all material points by natural and independent witnesses. The fact is that all three were charged with murder and only the accused. For nine months after the incident, he was found guilty of the crime and provided further credible assistance to the prosecutor. tion The case was another reliable evidence of medical evidence that reinforced the prosecution's evidence, not only did the defendant prove the prosecution's case, but it also stated that the three dangerous accusations of the accused were dangerous and disappointing. Nature opportunities were not available. Terrorists convicted and convicted of crimes were retained law firms from Kalaswala lawyer