MST. ASIYA KAUSAR versus AMJAD IKRAM
Section 12 Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 554 Implementation of the suit agreement for the specific performance of the contract sales contract, the plaintiff's evidence claimed that the suit was in the interest of the defendants through a forward-selling contract. The land was agreed to sell and it was fully paid. Consideration of the sale and the execution of the power of attorney registered in favor of the defendants. The defendants denied the execution of the alleged sale agreement, the receipt of the consideration amount, and the execution of the power of attorney as the plaintiff claimed it had failed to produce and establish solid oral. Documentary evidence, execution of the alleged sale agreement, consideration of the sale and execution of the power of attorney in favor of it will not be proof of the implementation of this document, but it is proof that they are I will not be proof of any document implementation. Significance and relevance of the testimony collection needs to be proven by clear, convincing, strong and reliable evidence, but in the deposition of the witnesses presented by the plaintiff. The contradictions and contradictions made his testimony unreliable, which allegedly led to the sale, and the trial court granted the plaintiff's favor. The High Court set aside the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Feroz Walla lawyer