Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASOOL versus THE STATE

Definitions of sections 302/34, 120b / 34 and 324/34 evidence were filed immediately and the conspiracy was proved by independent and irrevocable evidence at the time of the incident. The presence of eye witnesses cannot be doubted. Who did not carry any enmity against the accused and completely involved in the crime. The accused did not inspect the eyewitnesses, they will be examined by the Chief and can be relied upon because they were neutral and independent witnesses because the prosecution's witnesses identified them. The identity parade accused were natural witnesses to the events of the eyewitnesses, which was confirmed by circumstantial evidence, as well as a report from the Firearms Expert that the suspect was fired from a rifle recovered on prosecution. , He had proved his case against the accused, there was no loss in favor of the accused. online advocate from Daur lawyer