Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus THE STATE

Definitions of testimony of section 2302 (b) / & 34 & 2 2 2 The prosecution witnesses were not only relevant witnesses but also witnesses of the occasion who needed very strong independent cooperation to believe that the FIR was lacking. Much was recorded after the incident following the thesis discussions and preliminary inquiries. Despite being arrested the same day, the Investigation Officer did not detain him on murder and robbery charges that cast a serious shadow on the authenticity of the FIR, medical evidence denied the prosecution's version. That the victim was directly fired. The incident occurred on the chest far earlier than when the prosecution witnesses stated that three days after his recovery, the controversial articles were locked in a cell and that he was also against the department in the absence of the accused. Was violated 103, CR PC and was not reliable which they could not confirm the presence of the prosecution witnesses at the time the prosecution's version was confirmed and the suspect was suspected by them. Was acquitted under the circumstances ask a advocate free from Ghotki lawyer