Sections 420, 468 and 471 of the Corruption Prevention Act (Second of 1947), Section 5 (2) define the interchange of evidence that was allegedly executed by an attorney who, in favor of the accused, owns the land in question. The forgery was not exchanged through the fraudulent stamp paper found by the wife, but the complainant exchange attorney did not acquire the 19 kanal of 200 kanal of valuable land with land though it is located in a housing colony and Supported sales of 126 kanals and 19 marla land. Through verbal alterations, the accused were fraudsters who were compiled by Patwari's active compatriots who prepared the document and wrote that the attorney was not prosecuted under criminal law, if it was to cause illegal harm by illegal intent. Can be dishonestly intended. Through fraud or fraud, the accused was found to be the owner and the wrongful beneficiary; the trial court's decision was based on a proper evaluation of the evidence according to the judiciary. l The standards and convictions set by the high courts have been maintained
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
