MUHAMMAD TAYYAB ALIAS SAJJAD versus THE STATE
Section 2302 (b) of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997 of XXVII), the testimony of the eyes of the eye witnesses were the natural witnesses to the incident that occurred in front of their shop and house and killed them. Despite having a close relationship, they had no purpose. False allegations that this incident occurred in the light of day, witnesses in the identity parade correctly raised the suspect in reference to his role during the incident and before a trial court crime ampute sent to the Franzic Science Laboratory Was also identified. Earlier, the accused recovered from the charges with Kalashnikov. Medical evidence also helped the prosecution's version, and the aural witness was straightforward and persuasive, alleging that he was involved in sectarian terrorism. And he did not deserve any kind of relaxation in terms of punishment. The situation was confirmed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Jatoi lawyer
