Find a Lawyer

ALI IMRAN versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/324/392/34 FIR was lodged in a busy street of the city without sufficient delay due to the testimony of evidence and the two accused were specially designated. Such facts would rule out the possibility themselves. The complainant about a false impression or misidentification, who was also a police constable, was a motorcyclist and the victim was sitting in the back seat, according to the version given in the FIR, and his Yet his testimony cannot be shaken. The long distance test was subjected to allegation that since no identification parade was held, the identity was not, without doubt, free from suspicion. Since the complainant had specifically named the accused in the FIR and during the trial, the identity of the accused was not challenged even by the prosecution witness who also named the accused exclusively. Kept This aspect was not questioned and it was never suggested that they did not know the witness personally, the complainant admittedly did not hate the accused's guilt, in the circumstances of the witness's lonely statement Based on what was unpleasant, they had no enmity with the accused. It was natural and his testimony affected the confidence because it was not quantity but rather the statement of the accused complainant's character was stronger than the testimony of other witnesses, acknowledging the quality to which the court would weigh. Both suspects were armed with pistols, both were reported to be shooting, both escaping and avoiding their arrest. famous high court advocate from Hangu lawyer