Find a Lawyer

SARDAR ALI versus MST. SAFIA BIBI

Section 497 (5) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Rule 392/394/411 bail cancellation accused was not named in the FIR and she was involved in the case for the first time in more than three years, Through the supplementary statements of the complainant and the other witnesses who said that he and his accomplices had jointly confessed that they were unacceptable in the evidence that the accused was not charged with receiving Rs. 400 from the accused because the difference. And the number of currency notes was taken away. The FIR did not disclose any of the suspects during the incident. The accused was a lactating woman and there was no legally credible evidence on record against her till now. There can be no valid exception for the reasons given. The accused will submit a arrest warrant in this case if the session judge did not take into account the principle contained in Zubair's case (PLD 1986 SC 173) at the time of the greatness. The defendant protests for posting arrest bail. Again, the offender in this regard should be at the point where he is rested and the accused cannot be punished by the session judge for the jurisdiction and discretion of the session judge, in which case no interference by the session judge is guaranteed. Was given Accordingly, bail was dropped in the range patent advocate from Mirpur Khas lawyer