Find a Lawyer

GHULAM QADIR versus THE STATE

An FIR was promptly filed through witnesses sections 396/149, 324/149, 449/149 and 148 of the evidence even though he did not testify to the incident during his commission. Confirmed the murder of two suspected persons whose bodies were found on the spot when the FIR was made and they also removed the witness to the injured person who witnessed the eye witness to the complainant. Account was filed and therefore the complaint was present at the police station and when the FIR was lodged, the value of the statement of such witness was taken into account. I could not drag me that he had been injured during the incident did not witness the events of the eye. Details described how the robbery was attempted. Medical evidence confirmed ocular testimony The identity parade did not face any material misconduct. The witness who testified during the incident identified the accused's delay in recording the statement of testimony under section 161, the criminal procedure code was not fatal to the prosecution case when there was no reason for the accused's prejudice. 5 6 396 The crime was not required to be completed, the crime would begin under Pakistan Penal Code and the accused entered the premises as soon as the crime was to be targeted. Two of the killings were committed during the accused. The robbery attempt was a trial court's decision for good reasons. best advocate from Jhand lawyer