Find a Lawyer

AMANULLAH KHAN versus THE STATE

The appreciation of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34/109 evidence was a daily occurrence and an FIR was immediately filed. All the accused were specially named and the complainant filed his mother at the relevant time. And explained the presence of the deceased along with the father in the court during the hearing, the complainant made the statement in accordance with his version in the FIR as it was related to the role of the accused and his statement to the prosecution. The witness confirmed that the victim's son was the son of the victim who saw his father, mother and other close relatives. Being assassinated through time, both prosecution witnesses have long been subjected to interim investigations, but nothing has been brought to the record to indicate that they were either not witnesses to the incident or that they were The two witnesses were close together because of any enmity, the witnesses were close, such witnesses were not expected to be wrongly dismissed against the accused. The statements of the prosecution witnesses were proved by medical evidence. The duration of the injuries received, the time of death, and the weapon used, the accused was absconding with the law and for more than 3 years D was detained and can not offer a viable explanation for it. When the accused fails to prove the accused under section 87/88/88, CCPC, and if the appeal of the accused is not presented in the explanation, then the record along with other evidence in this case. The accused will have to weigh heavily. Or its weakness will not be fatal to litigation when in this case b lawer from fb area from Warah lawyer