Find a Lawyer

FAYYAZ KHALIQ ALIAS PAPPU versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/324/460/34/109 affirmation of FIR definition was filed with the FIR, promptly and the accused was specifically designated as the main culprit. Had suffered an isolation and fatal fire injury in the autopsy incident. During the night, but it was specifically mentioned in the FIR that the light bulb was near at that time and the presence of such a bulb was shown in the site process. The person also had a firearm injury, which was a natural witness to the incident when the incident took place in his own home, where another witness lived in the house adjacent to his brother / complainant's house and at the relevant time. But the controversy over his presence and the prosecution's testimony cannot be disputed, even though his father and mother of the deceased were. There was no serious motive to falsely implicate the accused in this kind of abusive case. Food and their credibility could not be shaken during their investigation The witnesses proved to be reliable enough to rely on the evidence established by the prosecutor, which confirmed the ocular account. And also provided independent recovery of arms from the accused. Ocular Account Verification Medical evidence confirmed the Ocular Account submitted by the complainant, and the testimony of the prosecutor, was obtained from the Motion, Recovery and Medical Evidence which was obtained from the accused's partner. Enough to prove the case against the accused. The complainant and the injured were also caused by the accused and the co-accused is the co-accused. famous high court advocate from Blitang lawyer