MEHBOOB AHMAD versus STATE
Complaint of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) The Complainant of Definition of Evidence submitted a condemnatory explanation for the delay of four days in filing the FIR in which the complainant / victim girl There is evidence that has affected trust. Evidence from the ocular witness was confirmed and the doctor performed a medical examination that the doctor stated that the complainant / victim was 11/12 years old, it was not a habit to have intercourse, but he had been subjected to sexual coercion. This was further corroborated by evidence of such a stand. The doctor who examined the accused and gave his opinion that he was a minor man and nothing was available to suggest that he was unable to perform sexual acts against the accused after he was fully established, Being almost 19 years of age I could not claim a reduction. At the time of the incident, it was amended in the age of seven that the accused could not be punished for the bandages because the accused was not punished as head.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Ziarat lawyer
