TAJ MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE
Prohibited (Order) Order 1979 Article Article 4 The testimony of evidence was presented in another case of property which expressed strong suspicion over the prosecution's story and subsequently raided the house of the accused accused. Specific questions and references regarding the drugs and their reports recovered to the Chemical Examiner were not disclosed to the accused in their statements under Section 2 Cr2, CRPC, He was subjected to prejudice for not being able to explain the status of, who was alleged to have not been cross-examined. Prosecutors were charged with their statements on oath under Section 340 (2), CCPC, on their defense ground - they were acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Kamalia lawyer
