Find a Lawyer

GUL ZAMIN versus STATE

Appreciation of Prohibition (Information of Head) Order 1979 Arts 3 and 4 Proof of Heroin Recovery was not controversial because the defendant himself admitted that the recovered articles contained heroin, although the return of the sample was delayed by five days. , But it turned out that they were welcomed by sent laboratories, and the rest of the material was kept in safe custody with Mohir, who was also the keeper of the sealed samples, otherwise delaying any of the samples. By no means was the defense of prejudice justified, so it turned out to be a misunderstanding. Judicial confession proved voluntary and the accused failed to prove that he was subjected to coercion or torture. The accused may or may not have been the owner of the narcotics exported in jerky, but his crime was proved to be his co-transporter and the actual culprit to escape after the suspect's criminal knowledge of the hero's presence Was set up in large numbers in fellow jerks and with the intention of moving from one province to another, the defendant was responsible for the crime he was charged in the same way as his sole act. The fugitive accused was the real owner of huge quantities of heroin, but was aware of the trafficking of illegal substances. The other accused remained silent and tried to become co-travelers the real perpetrator and misled the investigation. The accused claimed that he was about 65 to 65 years old, there were conditions for mitigation. By reducing the amount of punishment, the law will help those who helped the law property advocate from Haroonabad lawyer