ANARA versus THE STATE
Witnesses for review of evidence did not support the prosecution's version of the Evidence for Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, no doubt, it was confirmed by the Medico Legal Report but this report was a There was a suspicious document that caused confusion. There was no suspicion in the medical medical legal report mentioned about the date and place of his medical examination before he was sworn in before the trial at which the accused was released on bail, under which he committed the crime. Excluded their sentence from In any case, the suspects were subjected to suspicion and accordingly they were acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Mari Indus lawyer
