Find a Lawyer

DILSHAD SHAH versus STATE

Crimes of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (3) and 19 (2) of Victim, who was a toddler who gave clear evidence of the incident, accused him of abusive action against him. had gone. Hours of filing an FIR were not known in the litigation case, especially when a delayed explanation was given, but the victim was also received by the complainant's complaint and the Medico Legal Report. Gone. Either way, the defense will help because the victim's testimony cannot be ignored simply because his statement to the medical report cannot be finalized, if in this case, credible. And regardless of any material aspect, such testimony can be given. Medical evidence should be preferred to the evidence of the material value of the victim, can be made safely The trial court laid the basis for recording the conviction recorded by the two accused, thus, justifying and asking for interference. The sentence was retained, but in view of the youth and their age, their punishment was reduced if the crime was proved. registration advocate from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer