Criminal Procedure for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 3 and 8, the plaintiff's father, who was the father of the minor girl, filed an FIR against the Appellant under Section 10/11 under the Zilla (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 and Section 506. R was entered. The PPC alleges that the appellant along with his two brothers and wife called the accused's daughter in her neighbour's house and had committed the rape of the respondent's minor girl and appellant's clutches when her daughter filed. Released. An FIR was filed by the plaintiff against the appellant, and on the basis of the report submitted by the Investigation Agency under section 173, the sub divisional magistrate, CRPC, passed the order that the plaintiff's suit be filed against the appellant. The allegations in the FIR were not substantiated and the FIR was dismissed / dismissed and the appellant and his alleged accomplice were not cleared as the FIR filed against the appellant in the first phase. The IR was dismissed, then the case St. Appellant was never sent to any court respondent nor appealed to the court. No accused has been charged with adultery, nor has the court found the respondent falsely accused of adultery against the appellant, under section 8 against the plaintiff directly by the appellant / complainant. Complaint has been filed. Gaddaf's crime (enforcement head) ordinance, 1979 was rightly excluded
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
