Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 516A Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Article 3/4 Dangerous Drugs Act (Second 1930), Constitution of Section 14 of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD Detention The car applicant had the claim of ownership of the car in dispute on receipt of the income tax payment submitted by the Federal Shariat Court, which showed that he had paid a tax of Rs 14,218 in connection with the car. In this case, such an improvement was new and the session was not before the court. According to the prosecution, the applicant rejected the applicant's request for a car in custody, according to the prosecution, which was a thought intended only to be in the custody of the car, however, according to There is no law. The courts will hold the vehicles. If their owners or the persons from whom they have recovered can submit a guaranteed guarantee of the value of the vehicles, the trial court will decide the issue in the case. Is done. After considering all the factors in the light of appreciation of the applicant's application, property, \ assets, or anything else, and especially considering whether he / she is treating the charge sheet under Article 3/4 Can decide the case. Under the Prohibition (Enforcement of Head) Order, 1979 or Section 14 of the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930, both of which were related to the same crime, and the latest laws had to prevail. law websites from Dadu lawyer