Find a Lawyer

JUMMA KHAN versus STATE

Prohibited (enforced) Order 1979 Arts 3 and 4 Definitions of Evidence The statements of police recovery witnesses were consistent with the material details and the recovery of the heroin affected by the affidavit, its non-disclosure statement before the court. The accused did not affect the conviction, the quantity of heroin recovered is very large, it cannot be improperly charged without rhyme or reason, the heroin was recovered from the possession of the accused, his punishment and imprisonment and Under Section 4 of the Penalty. The Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order, 1979, was upheld while it was acquitted under Article 3. criminal advocate from Rawalpindi lawyer