MUHAMMAD HASSAR versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB
Criminal of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 and 18 Appeal of Evidence Appeal Against His Punishment and Punishment Medical examination contradicts the prosecution's story as the doctor examined the victim and found that he was not a victim of adultery. But the sexual abuse was attempted by the doctor, suggesting that penetration did not occur, which was the main ingredient of the offense of adultery, as set against the accused of attempted rape, which included punishment. Would be in the interest of justice and the offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood), Ordinance, 1979, was set aside and Instead, the accused was convicted and sentenced under Section 18 of this Ordinance. ance and his sentence was reduced accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Landi Kotal lawyer