Find a Lawyer

WAJID HUSSAIN versus STATE

The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (3) and 11 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (V 1898), charged by the Power of Court for summoning and examining any material evidence of section 540 evidence That he had not abducted the complainant's daughter, who went on his own accord and entered into a valid marriage with her. The accused provided defensive evidence in the form of documents that are on the presence and absence file of the marriage contract. The recording of the bride's statement under Section 161, CRPC and the calendar of the witnesses' testimony did not mention their name and no inquiry was made on the accuracy of the said marriage, especially when the documents were displayed. The prosecutor's story was subsequently fired. In the presence of the said documents, the prosecution was fully supported by the documents exhibited in the defense by the accused trial court, under Section 4040 Cr, CRPC, caution for seeking and examining the persons concerned. The case was presented to the court for a de novo trial at the trial. His side closed online advocate from Khanpur lawyer