UCC PRIVATE LIMITED versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, LAHORE
Section 302 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (3), the definition of evidence was immediately filed with the first information report against the accused, and witnesses saw the suspects panicking. The evidence was supported. In this way, there was no evidence to suggest that the accused was involved in the case because of the enmity. It was completely out of place, because nothing was brought to the record by the accused during the trial. The father, who was the father of the deceased girl, was an unhappy man who belonged to the lower classes. Regarding the complainant in the circumstances, it cannot be said that he used his influence on the police to obtain inappropriate support in the investigation as the accused has accused the investigation as being too easy. The matter was because only one person was named in the FIR, the body of the deceased girl was lying there and her shawl, which was later stained with semen, was also lying, anything from the accused. The fact that he could not be recovered had no reason to believe he was innocent. Witnesses agreed with medical examination Defense witnesses, who were close relatives of the accused, did not claim that they attended or were welcomed during the interrogation. The top official or even the area's nobles to tell them that the accused has been involved in a false case against the accused after the case has been fully proved.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
