MUHAMMAD FAROOQ versus STATE
Prohibition (Enforcement) Order 1979 Article Article 4 Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), opting to record the confessional statement of the accused under section 342, instead of recording the testimony of the key witnesses in the testimony of sections 342 and 364. CRPC was neither tried by the trial court to enable the accused to explain the circumstances presented under Section 2 Cr2, the CRPC, nor to the section 646464, C The legal requirements laid down under the RPC were met. As a result, the accused were set aside and the case was referred to the sessions court for trial according to law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Hattian lawyer
