ALI SHER versus STATE
The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 section 10 (3) was defining the evidence, the delay in filing the FIR was fully explained and it was understandable in this regard that the medical evidence and the Chemical Examiner's prosecution version There was no dispute between the reports. The victim's shalwar was charged positively with male semen, a 22-year-old man, not a previous offender, and was not shown to be a dangerous, hard or frustrated criminal prosecutor when he was able to prove the accused. That is, the convicted T and the trial court convicted the accused were retained with the modification that the accused was whipped by the trial court, the termination of the sentence of termination of sentence. Was observed, the conviction could not be increased as a prayer. Because of the complainant, no sign of external violence was observed on the body of the victim and no complainant of any kind of cruelty was made by the complainant Pa. rty against the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Badin lawyer