ZULFIQAR ALI versus STATE
The Criminal Procedure for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) and 16 Proof of Evidence Testimony was corroborated by the prosecution's testimony, and it also supported medical evidence. Was about having sex. The chemical examiner found vaginal shrubs taken from prosecutors within a short period of time before the prosecutor was examined, with injuries to the human sperm, which allegedly led to prosecution. They were also proven in the case through statements from the witnesses of the Lady Doctor prosecution. A lengthy investigation was subjected to but no delay in filing an FIR that was otherwise not fatal was properly described by the complainant in the case as indicated in this case. The nature was modest and had no significant effect. The case does not depend on the authenticity or the apparent value of the testimony such as the existence of such minor contradictions, because the contradictions themselves will not result in what the witness has stated and what is on the record According to other evidence, it should be thrown out if the statement was recorded. Earlier, the police and the trial were helping each other, yet, despite minor contradictions, the trial court could safely be relied upon, in the circumstances, to discredit the testimony of the prosecution witnesses. I was not justified. Minor Contradictions / Contradictions Neither allegation of personal enmity to the accused person
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Bhara Kahu lawyer