SHAHBAZ versus STATE
The Offense for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, in Sections 5 and 10 (2) of the witnesses, because of his lower social status, he surrendered himself to a male suspect who, under some form of coercion and coercion. Was accepted. The accused himself had the right to be acquitted of the crime of imprisonment, providing for the delivery of a child and being voluntary and truthful despite the fact that the accused had moderate content through her pregnancy. Nevertheless, even if recovered, the basis of his conviction under section 10 (2) of the Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979) and accordingly its punishment set aside. He was sentenced and because of this he was already serving a prison sentence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Attock lawyer