FIRDOS BEGUM versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL SHAH
Adultery (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) and 11 Criminal Code of Conduct (V 1898), appeal against section 417 bad respondents / accused under which sections 10 (3) and 11 were charged. After the breakdown in the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) ordinance, 1979, the alleged victim filed an appeal against the verdict passed by the trial after 11 days a month after the trial. , The alleged victim did not confirm anyone. The medical examination came against the peer collection of the victim who made various statements under Section 161, CRPC and Section 164, CRPC was a clear piece of anomalies and many delays. And in the presence of contradictory statements, it was not possible to believe her as a credible witness as a Lady doctor, who had examined the victim of the alleged victim, considered it a habit of having sex. There was no misunderstanding in the judgment in the trial court. The reasons for this decision can neither be interrupted for being artificial or being funny.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Hyderabad lawyer
