MUHAMMAD HANIF versus STATE
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) / 18 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), a defining, natural, and exceptions to the one-day delay in filing Section 354 FIR, which was a medico legal The report and other evidence of the prosecution were corroborated, verified by truthfulness and inspiration. According to prosecutors, it was alleged that he had opened his shalwar and he was arguing with him whenever the door was forced to open, a case against which the accused was brought under the purview of the department. 354, PPC and the offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) under section 10 (3) / 18 of the 1979 Ordinance, cannot be punished for the offense of rape and the attempt to commit the crime, therefore, As a result, he was set aside and sentenced under Section 354, PPC and sentenced accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Bhera lawyer
