Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SAFDAR versus SAJJAWAL KHAN

The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) and 16 Definitions of Evidence Along with the testimony of the star, the complainant has presented different and partially conflicting versions of the prosecutor's story, which is evidence of abduction. On the day of the alleged incident, the alleged abductor was not living with the complainant's wife (complainant / husband) but he was living with his parents. The complainant had been married to the accused by the alleged abductor. Recognized the existence of a case which was earlier the complainant's case. The alleged kidnapper filed an application in Alka Magistrate's Court to restore marital rights against the alleged kidnapper so that she was living with her parents after divorcing her husband / complainant, but since her parents There were greedy people who wanted to get it. After taking the money, she married someone else, she had left her parents' house and was living with her friend Elg, who had been arrested by the kidnapper, who had prayed for her to be sent to the capital and from there. The alleged kidnapper was dispatched, thus, FIR Swabis alleges that he did not escape from the complainant / husband's home at that time and date. The alleged crime of adultery against the kidnappers and against the alleged accomplices was positive, proving that he did not belong to the accused, but it appears that a prosecution failed to prove a case against the accused. And he was rightly acquitted of this charge, and with such a bad order, circumstances cannot be interfered with. property advocate from Pirpai lawyer