Find a Lawyer

WAHID BAKHSH versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/364/34 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17, Validation of Evidence and No Evidence of Injury that Caused the Death of the Defendant Neither Judicial Confession The crime exists There was no mention of the accused nor any motive in the FIR, only the evidence on which the prosecutor's case was restored was pronounced dead on which the accused was allegedly killed. Presented to the prosecution's witnesses where they were allegedly injured and recovered Deng and other articles. Evidence of a verbal death declaration by a victim before her death, not encouraging the belief that there were injuries to the deceased, which were found on her body (during the post-mortem). ) Could stay as conscious as it was a victim. A large number of nature-bound wounds could not remain dead, but it did not mention where they were abducted and suffered injuries. The deceased did not mention the weapons or the weapons with which he suffered injuries. The recovery of weapons such as s dongs was of no consequence as they were not blood stained and even the victim did not say that he was injured by the accused along with dangs with other articles related to the deceased victim. The recovery, too, did not result in a contradictory statement of the prosecution's witnesses, neither was it linked to the crime of the accused nor the prosecution's latest case in the face of serious doubts about the guilt of the accused. But a list of advocates from Jhand lawyer