MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE versus STATE
Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 302/34 Offenses of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (3) Review of Evidence There is no benefit to retrieving a gun on the occasion of the prosecution. However, the empty stomach was not recovered from the place which causes the vaginal shrubs to be stained with semen and the opinion of the doctor proved the commission of adulteration of the affected woman and her sex. He died as a result of fireworks wounds, no doubt that he could corroborate any other evidence, but the suspect himself did not associate himself with the crime. Was not and cannot be trusted. The evidence for the last viewing was not particularly credible when it was not proved by any evidence and the accused was given the benefit of the doubt and was acquitted in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Wan Radha Ram lawyer
