HASSAN MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE
The crime of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (3) and 16 of the testimony were found by the District Judge on the alleged marriage between the accused and the complainant as it did not prove its existence and the complainant's consent Without question, a marriage can be created only after the arrangement of the marriage or when the event of the marriage was accepted. The charges, under these circumstances, cannot be considered under any of the major mistakes that the complainant has made in her regular He was married to his wife and he had internal affairs with her. The commission of the adultery clearly stripped the complainant from his village by the accused and subjecting him to adultery was also found to be a crime under Section 16 of the Ordinance VII of 1979, along with the reduction of his sentence and the punishment of the accused. Was also retained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Kakur Town lawyer