Find a Lawyer

SALIM AKHTAR versus THE STATE

The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (21) The eyewitnesses of the testimony were liars because they could not see that a dark room was located at some distance in the dark room. Detection of semen on vaginal shrubs did not prove sexual misconduct on the outer door of the house itself between the two accused, according to medical evidence, but it cannot be assumed that the two accused. In the eyes of witnesses who committed adultery, the accused was acquitted attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer