MUMTAZ HUSSAIN versus STATE
The Criminal Procedure for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10/11/16 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 451/366/109/34 Investigating the evidence, the trial court found all the accused guilty of six offenses, but they Only one sentence was pronounced. Not every one of them was convicted of the crime, though it was mandatory for the same offense, however, the offense was committed under the Enforcement Hood Ordinance 1979, so that the accused was not punished. Was gone The record of the crime of adultery was available on record as the recovery of the alleged kidnapper was still pending, but the accused was convicted under the Section 10 (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 and despite Section 366, the PPC was acquitted. Was done. The accused was convicted and the trial court did not deal with the matter properly, there was not enough evidence on record to prove any crime against any of the accused. The accused were acquitted accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Dargai lawyer
