AZIZ AHMAD versus STATE
Order of Prohibition (Enforcement Limits) 1979 Article 4 Evidence Defined The police did not attempt to comply with the provisions of section 103, CRPC section 1565, affecting the recovery of heroin from the accused and Nor was anyone given the explanation of the failure and, instead, to prove his recovery, he presented his stock witness who appeared to the police in more than 30 cases and lived in: the incident. Evidence of recovery, therefore, could not be relied upon, several miles away from where it was located. And accordingly the accused was acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Usta Mohammad lawyer
