Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus STATE

The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 12 Explosive Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 377 Definition of Evidence Testimony of an Appealing Eye Three days after the incident, the investigating officer was investigated and did so. Could not It is likely that the complainant reported the police with a delay of three days and the explanation of the delay did not seem appropriate and the actual complainant's medical support was not supported; Twenty-four hours later, Shalwar was wearing a complaint when it was not handed over to the Investigation Officer at the time of the incident, with no evidence of any penetration, the Chemical Examiner's report said positively about the anus and it appeared Was that he had been recovered. Since the complainant voluntarily went to his village with the accused, his abduction by the accused or the accused did not prove that the accused was a cquitted circumstance best law firms from Hyderabad lawyer