MUKHTAR AHMAD versus STATE
Section 2 (b) r 9 369 and 1111 Off Crime of Enforcement (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979 1979), Validation of Section 10 (3) / 18 Evidence for the last time in the company of the accused. The evidence I found was contradictory and the physical evidence did not support the prosecution's case regarding the death of a deceased victim and the rape or recapture of the rapists on the recovered jewelry statement by the complainant. It was not stated that the deceased wore it while leaving it, the case for home prosecution was based solely on circumstantial evidence which, even if it is fully believed, would have resulted in the defendant's innocence. The assumptions were not excluded but they were dismissed in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Kot Mithan lawyer
