Find a Lawyer

DAWA KHAN versus STATE

The Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hoodoo) Ordinance 1979 S20 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 395, defines the evidence of the accused who imposed his face at the time of the incident was not known to the complainant and the prosecution. The identity parade was not organized by. After identifying and hearing the complainant for his identification, the accused was subsequently named in the statement under section 64 Cr Cr CCPC, which allegedly made four of the recovered garments. The fragments did not actually prove to the complainant the confessional statement of the accused was the defendant acquitted pakistani advocates Fizagat lawyer