ATIQ-UR-RAHMAN versus STATE
Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 16 and 10 (3) Hearing of the Testimony of Evidence The affected girl was not examined as a witness in the trial court which relied solely on her statement listed under Section 164, CR PC. What was: The victim's statement was not registered in the presence of the accused in Section 6464, CCP and was not provided any opportunity for cross-examination; legal evidence against the accused cannot be considered, medical evidence. The defendants were acquitted, too, who did not support the prosecution case. Conditions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Madinah lawyer
