Find a Lawyer

YOUSUF versus THE STATE

There was no evidence on the record of the Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 section 10 (2) and 16 of the evidence to prove the accused's escape with his accomplice, or by him. Was arrested before recording. The FIR was registered three months after the incident, though the complainant knew from the very first day of the defendant's defense request that his wife's alleged escape had not been abducted by the co-accused And neither were they harmed. He had left the complainant's home with his children due to misconduct and it appeared that the positive report of the Chemical Examiner regarding vaginal replies could not be relied upon because three weeks later the Chemical Examiner's office. Was sent to They were taken away and held in safe custody without interruption during such a period. The suspects were acquitted. property advocates from Goular Khel lawyer