MUSTAFA KHAN versus THE STATE
Prohibition (Enforcement of Limitation) Order 1979 Arts 3 (1) (a) and 3 (2) (i) Appraisal of evidence was not responsible for the retaliation in those cases which required two independent witnesses in the area. Is. The recovered advisers were in charge and were in control of the railway engine, including its battery room, where two bags of prohibited chars and opium were left open before the train journey began, so, beware of the bag mentioned. May be. The prosecution attributed to them and their means of transportation proved that the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court on trial by the trial court was upheld.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Toru lawyer
