MUNIR AHMAD versus THE STATE
The prosecution's prosecution changed the timing of the prosecution in the Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 section 10 (3), and its testimony was not proved by medical evidence, as was alleged by the accused, the parties. The former adversary confessed and his explanation of the beating by the complaining party is supported by his medical report, the evidence of witnesses who was closely related to the prosecution and the former with the accused. There was enmity that could not be relied upon by the prosecutor. Bad in the situation
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from FR Kohat lawyer
