RIAZ AHMAD versus STATE
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 18/10 (3) The FIR had an unequivocally significant delay of eight days. The complainant failed to explain the conduct of his close relatives who stated that the case against the accused was false. The complainant did not make contradictory statements, nor did he drag the accused against his will or complain of any injury to him, nor did he show the investigating officer the same, nor did he show off his torn clothing. And not because of the enmity between the accused party and the complaining party. Serious political differences were also set on record, and the accused were acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Deh Pathaan lawyer
