Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SAIFULLAH versus STATE


Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article Article 4 Definition of Evidence Police have not made any arrangements for compliance with Section 103, CRPC, despite having received first and specific information about the prohibited goods brought by the accused. No explanation for this. Compliance with this, except for a general statement of witnesses that people were not prepared to be associated with the recovery process, which did not preclude police officers from their legal responsibilities, was the only witness to the recovery - police and excise personnel. Yes, their evidence should be scrutinized. Due to care and caution and suffering from the same contradictions and shortcomings, recovery was suspected and the accused was acquitted accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Farooqabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.