SAIFULLAH versus STATE
Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article Article 4 Definition of Evidence Police have not made any arrangements for compliance with Section 103, CRPC, despite having received first and specific information about the prohibited goods brought by the accused. No explanation for this. Compliance with this, except for a general statement of witnesses that people were not prepared to be associated with the recovery process, which did not preclude police officers from their legal responsibilities, was the only witness to the recovery - police and excise personnel. Yes, their evidence should be scrutinized. Due to care and caution and suffering from the same contradictions and shortcomings, recovery was suspected and the accused was acquitted accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Mari Indus lawyer