SOHAIL SARDAR versus THE STATE
Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article Article 3 The testimony of the evidence was recovered from the scooter's toolbox, which the acquitted accused was operating while the accused was sitting in the back seat. Under Article 3, the accused could not be convicted. Prohibition (Enforcement of Head) Order, 1979, since he was not actually transporting heroin, no evidence was recorded except for the retaliatory confession statement of the accused, but only four days afterwards the possession of his buggy was proved. May be. It was not confirmed by the arrest and any other evidence that the accused was acquitted in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Hattar lawyer
